Stalking Sunlight Bloggers
So far!
- Nanette - Nanette twirly humanbeams dot com
- Doc Logan -
- melonhead99
- Arcturus
- James Benjamin (of The Mahatma X Files)
bLog In to Publish
note: Apparently some items (or entire posts) are not displaying properly in IE. I am not sure yet how to fix that or what to do about it except... well, Firefox is pretty cool and it's free, so....
Nanette's Stuff
Virtual Bookshelf
Writings, knowledge, stuff that I don't want to lose track of
Untangling It All
Notes to myself
To Read - Someday
Useful Things
Monthly Archives
August, 2008
July, 2008
June, 2008
May, 2008
April, 2008
March, 2008
February, 2008
January, 2008
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
August, 2007
July, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
December, 2006
November, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
May, 2006
April, 2006
March, 2006
January, 2006
November, 2005
August, 2005
subscribe to Stalking Sunlight rss feed
Some Rights Reserved
World Observers Wanted
Become a citizen journalist and record your world. Political, social and media analysts, human rights observers, environmentalists - what is the news and how does it affect lives in your world? Join today!
|
|
Seeking light in a murky world
|
|
|
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
I beg to differ
by James Benjamin
There is another choice, contrary to prevailing wisdom in what passes for a “left” in this country. Of course the Dem “leadership” will sell out on FISA, just like they will sell out on impeachment and ending these idiotic wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. For the life of me, I can’t understand why anyone still believes any of them. They have proven themselves entirely useless again and again.
Since I feel the need to repeat myself on the matter, let’s try this again. If you want a “left” that truly lives up to the name, it’s going to take a radical rethink of how we play the political game. The system is broken. Continuing to pretend that one can work “within the system” with the oligarchs currently entrenched in power is a strategy doomed to failure.
I start with a simple question: “Is less bad good enough?” My answer from nearly three years ago, which I stand by today is: When lives and quality of life are at stake, the answer is no. As of late I have given the words of the late Malcom X a fresh read, and I have a couple observations. One is that in many respects, when we’re talking about civil rights and human rights in America things really haven’t changed much since Malcom’s day. The images from the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina of the dire poverty that has consigned so many of our fellow Americans to a lifetime of marginal existence (what the Marxists would call the lumpenproletariat) and neglect by the very government that is supposed to serve them, will haunt me for as long as I can still draw a breath. Those images should haunt all of us. The specter of racism and classism continues to plague our political and social landscape, just as it has all of my life. The second observation: politicians from one party or another haved talked a good game when it comes to promoting progressive ideas and policies - but with few exceptions they don’t walk the talk. That was a problem that Malcom confronted with the issues that were salient to him, and is a problem that we on the left continue to confront. The Dems have assumed for so long that they have the leftists, the women, the ethnic minorities in their back pockets because presumably we have “nowhere else to go.” The result is, as it was in the 1950s and 1960s, a not-so-benign neglect of our issues and values from the powers that be. And as long as we keep registering Democrat and periodically show up to vote when expected, nothing changes, except maybe for the worse. We have a party where its members say the right things more often than not, but then by and large approve laws like The Patriot Act, the bankruptcy bill that will end up burying working families who’ve encountered exhorbitant medical expenses; they’ve been silent when the White House nominated an architect of the current pro-torture policy to the office of AG; when it comes to the illegal war being fought against the Iraqis, many of the Dems want to send more troops and kill of even more people; they’ve been largely silent on the issue of voting irregularities both in Ohio and Florida; and we know that privacy rights are also no longer sacred in Dem circles.
What to do? In Malcom’s last year on this planet he offered up some simple advice that I think we can all use: be organized, and don’t affiliate with either the Dems or the GOP. That’s the general idea behind American Solidarity: organize physically, financially, intellectually. Many of us come from varying backgrounds and have varying pet causes, but let’s face it - those of us who are living paycheck to paycheck, those of us who value liberty, who value equality, who value justice, who value privacy have a hell of a lot in common. Technological advances in the last decade or so make it easier for us to coordinate and to exchange ideas and information than ever before. It’s way past time to start using those tools to our advantage. Blogs are one of our tools, playing the same role that zines played in the 1980s and pamphlets such as Paine’s played during the Revolution some 230 years ago. Blogging is only part of that picture. Cernig fills in some of the details elsewhere. Clearly, unions, thinktanks, civil liberties organizations are going to be salient as well.
Being unaffiliated with the major political parties is also crucial for an American Solidarity movement. The GOP can be written off as a lost cause. The Dems, I’m also skeptical of, but will note this much: if they think we’re registered as Dems, they can assume that we’ll continue to accept the status quo. Malcom was onto something back in 1964 and 1965 when he advocated refusing to back any candidate until it was clear that they were willing to walk their talk. If they turn out to be kosher, then by all means support them, but only to the extent that they are representing us. If they stop representing us, we should be willing to walk away from them. If they know that their constituents mean business, they’ll be more careful to represent us in whatever legislative body they hold office. There’s strength in numbers, especially when those numbers are independent.
Continue Reading I beg to differ
share this post! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1 pages
|
|
Support HumanBeams!
|