|
||
|
|
||
Science and EnvironmentThursday, November 15, 2007 Republicans In (Hurricane Ravaged) Mississippi Say: “The Rich Come First” by Nanette
And this comes as a surprise to anyone? I think not. I don’t see how anyone could even pretend anymore. Though they no doubt will try.... “Who cares if the affluent get the lion’s share of help!? Class warfare! The poor have bootstraps, what more do they want? HANDOUTS!?” I've always loved the word "advocate". I know it has a few meanings... or rather, that it does not always apply to good things, but still. "Advocates for the poor". For justice. For a fair shake. It has a nice ring to it. The people affected by Katrina (and other disasters) and ignored by city, state and local governments need all the advocates they can get. At the same time, I hate the word and the need for it.
Posted by Nanette on 11/15 at 08:16 PM
Civil Rights • Coalitions • HumanRights • Racism • Science-Environment • ShameOnUs • (0) Comments • Permalink • Tell-a-Friend
share this post! |
Cdesign Proponentsists, Irreducible Complexity And Bacterial Flagellum, Oh My! by Nanette
No, I haven’t gone mad and suddenly started typing in awkward tongues. Beyond what I normally do, that is. It’s just that I’ve fallen in love! With PBS’s NOVA, particularly their recent show Judgement Day: Intelligent Design On Trial. Did you see it? If not, what a treat you missed. Fascinating, a little freaky, funny - evolutionary biology and science made so easy and presented with such clarity that even us non-scientists could understand it without strain. Of course, it had to be presented that way because of the court case. The judge wasn’t a scientist either. Judgement Day: Intelligent Design On Trial tells the story of the Dover school board and their efforts to introduce Intelligent Design into their science curriculum, and the great divisions this caused in the community, in the schools and on the board itself. Much of what occurred was familiar to me, on some level, as I’d been reading Ed Brayton, who has been fairly heavily involved in fighting ID for some time now, but watching this presentation gave me a whole new level of understanding. Not only of the science involved, but of the deceit of the ID proponents, and the lengths they’d gone through to attempt to convince people that ID was not promoting religion. “cdesign proponentsists”, in the title, was one of the more amusing discoveries of those preparing for the court case, on the science side. The link is to Nick Matzke, of Panda’s Thumb, who wrote about it a couple of years ago. And, via Panda’s Thumb, I also just learned that PBS has put the transcripts and entire show online, a day early, so anyone who missed it (as apparently some stations didn’t play it, for one reason or another) can now read and view the entire thing at the pbs site. Excellent. I am not a religious person but I have no problem… or little problem… with people practicing their own personal religions in their personal spaces. I do have a huge problem with people attempting to put their religion into public schools, no matter how it’s couched. It just doesn’t belong there. The separation of church and state is there for a reason and, in my view, it’s there for the protection of the church far more than the state. Although both lose, when the two are mixed together.
Posted by Nanette on 11/15 at 07:39 PM
I'm old and crabby and I have a pen • Science-Environment • (4) Comments • Permalink • Tell-a-Friend
share this post! |
Tuesday, September 18, 2007 Random Crabbiness (And Notes): Thank The Goddes For Whoopi by Nanette
I’m sorry but… what do you mean you don’t know if the earth is flat? It’s not that I’m a huge Whoopi Goldberg fan, it’s just that I am so glad that the black woman named Sherry something is not the only black woman on The View. She’s funny and all that, but man… my mom had the show on this morning and there she (Sherry something) is, sitting there saying that not only does she not believe at all in evolution - which is bad enough, but in that she’s not alone - but that she has no idea if the world is flat or not! She’s never thought about it, she says. I’m all for respecting people’s religious beliefs (or, at least some of them) but c’mon. Anyway, at least Whoopi was there to balance her out with a belief in science (as well as and in conjunction with deities) otherwise it would have been conventional wisdom in no time, among the viewers of that show, that “Black people think the world is flat!” I guess the idea (if they were even considering it) of having Margaret Cho AND Whoopi on the same show sounded just a bit too combustible, even if far more interesting - thus anti-science, anti-sense, but funny, Sherry something. [added] Quote for… maybe not the day. Maybe not even a good quote, but there you go - it does have the advantage of being true:
I have started an offline journal. In part because when I used to keep one, I liked it - like most people, I write more freely when I know no one (besides me and the NSA) will be reading it until I make it public. This way, I can natter on about this or that thought before pulling them together into something um… finished. And polished. And with all sorts of proper punctuation and grammar. Okay, sure… let’s not get carried away here. [added 9/19] about the flat earth and via Oliver Willis, the co-host’s name is Sherri Shepherd. Here is a partial transcript of the exchange and a link to the video. Sigh.
Posted by Nanette on 09/18 at 07:14 PM
I'm old and crabby and I have a pen • Science-Environment • (7) Comments • Permalink • Tell-a-Friend
share this post! |
Thursday, September 13, 2007 by Nanette
Although, looked at in the right light, it could be. I’ve been reading these threads off and on, over the past couple of days. Interesting points, much to think about, but… and this is no doubt a consequence of having sometimes decidedly odd thought processes… ... what most comes to mind while reading these is that, very often, people will buy low-fat cookies - and then proceed to eat twice as many of them.
Posted by Nanette on 09/13 at 08:01 PM
Science-Environment • (0) Comments • Permalink • Tell-a-Friend
share this post! |
Tuesday, July 03, 2007 I Just Saw the Oddest Thing on PBS… by Nanette
A Black person! Who wasn’t singing, dancing, cooking or Martin Luther King. OR Gwen Ifill. Two, actually. It didn’t hit me at first, how odd it was. I passed by the living room where my mom was watching the show, glanced at the TV and was well on my way to the kitchen before I stopped and said “Whoa, wait - what was that?” and had to come back and look again.
So, two whole Black folk in non-stereotypical roles on PBS. It’s a start. Mind you, I live in a red state area of California so in other areas there may already have been loads of people on PBS of various ethnicities hosting various non-stereotypical shows and they’ve just not aired here, but still. Good news.
Posted by Nanette on 07/03 at 08:06 PM
General • Civil Rights • Whosoutthere • Just Life • Science-Environment • (1) Comments • Permalink • Tell-a-Friend
share this post! |
Thursday, February 08, 2007 It Seems a Shame to Separate Them Now by Nanette
Did they somehow know they were dying, of whatever cause, and decide to lie down, wrap their arms and legs around each other and die while looking into each other’s eyes?
These skeletons, recently discovered in Italy - a couple not only hugging but what appears to be completely intertwined - are thought to be 5,000 to 6,000 years old. According to the BBC, -- "The pair from the Neolithic period were discovered outside Mantua, about 40km (25 miles) south of Verona. The pair, almost certainly a man and a woman, are thought to have died young as their teeth were mostly intact, said chief archaeologist Elena Menotti. "It's an extraordinary case," said Ms Menotti. "There has not been a double burial found in the Neolithic period, much less two people hugging - and they really are hugging," she told Reuters news agency. -- Arrowheads and a knife were found beside the couple, along with other tools, but there will have to be more study by scientists and archeologists to determine how and when they died and, hopefully, how and when they lived, although that will be a bit more difficult, no doubt. While it will be science that determines what actually happened, it's hard not to let ones imagination supply the details. Did they somehow know they were dying, of whatever cause, and decide to lie down, wrap their arms and legs around each other and die while looking into each other's eyes? Or maybe they were just peacefully sleeping, snuggled closely for warmth, and death came so suddenly that they didn't even have a chance to move. It's possible that they were positioned in this manner after death, by some ancient group of mortuary attendants with a romantic bent, but that seems the least likely to me. Not that I know much about ancient burial practices but even Ms. Menotti, who does, says "I've been doing this job for 25 years. I've done digs at Pompeii, all the famous sites, but I've never been so moved because this is the discovery of something special." Maybe we'll never know... and maybe that's okay.
Posted by Nanette on 02/08 at 08:10 AM
Just Life • Science-Environment • (3) Comments • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink • Tell-a-Friend |
||





A science show. With a
And there is another show on called 