sun and face logo - home link Human Beams International
Politics Our Humanity Page Break Both Sides Now Life...At Large Young Minds Community Blog RSS Feeds
 

Seeking light in a murky world


Science and Environment



Republicans In (Hurricane Ravaged) Mississippi Say: “The Rich Come First”

by Nanette

And this comes as a surprise to anyone? I think not. I don’t see how anyone could even pretend anymore. Though they no doubt will try....

“Who cares if the affluent get the lion’s share of help!? Class warfare! The poor have bootstraps, what more do they want? HANDOUTS!?”

NYTIMES -

GULFPORT, Miss., Nov. 14 — Like the other Gulf Coast states battered by Hurricane Katrina, Mississippi was required by Congress to spend half of its billions in federal grant money to help low-income citizens trying to recover from the storm.

But so far, the state has spent $1.7 billion in federal money on programs that have mostly benefited relatively affluent residents and big businesses. The money has gone to compensate many middle- and upper-income homeowners who lost their houses to flooding, to aid utility companies whose equipment was damaged and to prop up the state’s insurance system.

Just $167 million, or about 10 percent of the federal money, has been spent on programs dedicated to helping the poor, mostly through a smaller grant program for lower-income homeowners.

And while that total will certainly increase, Mississippi has set aside just 23 percent of its $5.5 billion grant money — $1.25 billion — for these programs. About 37 percent of the residents of the state’s coast are low income, according to federal figures.

Mississippi is the only state for which the Bush administration has waived the rule that 50 percent of its Community Development Block Grants be spent on low-income programs, according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which administers the grant program. It is also the only state to ask for such waivers.

[....] State officials, from Gov. Haley Barbour on down, insist that just as the storm hurt both rich and poor, the state does not discriminate by race or income when it hands out aid.

The state’s spending plan “moves business to the forefront and forgets about the people on the ground,” said Anthony Thompson, pastor at Tabernacle of Faith Ministries, whose spotless church (rebuilt by volunteers) is next to a moldering subsidized housing project that he says has not been touched since the storm.

In his mostly black neighborhood in west Gulfport, Mr. Thompson said, “I see a lot of people waiting on help; I see a lot of houses still damaged.”

[....]

To be eligible, families had to have carried homeowners’ insurance, so that, as the governor said when he was selling the plan to Congress, “we’re not bailing out irresponsible people.”

But advocates for the poor said that requirement barred many of the least affluent, especially retirees and the disabled, who live on fixed incomes. “The fact is, people who have no money choose food and medicine, and not insurance,” said Ashley Tsongas, a policy adviser for the aid group Oxfam America. “That moral superiority doesn’t recognize the reality people face.”

I've always loved the word "advocate". I know it has a few meanings... or rather, that it does not always apply to good things, but still. "Advocates for the poor". For justice. For a fair shake. It has a nice ring to it. The people affected by Katrina (and other disasters) and ignored by city, state and local governments need all the advocates they can get.

At the same time, I hate the word and the need for it.


Posted by Nanette on 11/15 at 08:16 PM
Civil RightsCoalitionsHumanRightsRacismScience-EnvironmentShameOnUs
(0) CommentsPermalinkTell-a-Friend

share this post! | del.icio.us Favicon | | Digg Favicon | | Furl Favicon | | Google Bookmarks Favicon | | NewsVine Favicon | | Spurl Favicon | | StumbleUpon Favicon | | Technorati Favicon |




Cdesign Proponentsists, Irreducible Complexity And Bacterial Flagellum, Oh My!

by Nanette

No, I haven’t gone mad and suddenly started typing in awkward tongues. Beyond what I normally do, that is.

It’s just that I’ve fallen in love! With PBS’s NOVA, particularly their recent show Judgement Day: Intelligent Design On Trial. Did you see it? If not, what a treat you missed. Fascinating, a little freaky, funny - evolutionary biology and science made so easy and presented with such clarity that even us non-scientists could understand it without strain.

Of course, it had to be presented that way because of the court case. The judge wasn’t a scientist either. 

Judgement Day: Intelligent Design On Trial tells the story of the Dover school board and their efforts to introduce Intelligent Design into their science curriculum, and the great divisions this caused in the community, in the schools and on the board itself. Much of what occurred was familiar to me, on some level, as I’d been reading Ed Brayton, who has been fairly heavily involved in fighting ID for some time now, but watching this presentation gave me a whole new level of understanding. Not only of the science involved,  but of the deceit of the ID proponents, and the lengths they’d gone through to attempt to convince people that ID was not promoting religion.

“cdesign proponentsists”, in the title, was one of the more amusing discoveries of those preparing for the court case, on the science side. The link is to Nick Matzke, of Panda’s Thumb, who wrote about it a couple of years ago. And, via Panda’s Thumb, I also just learned that PBS has put the transcripts and entire show online, a day early, so anyone who missed it (as apparently some stations didn’t play it, for one reason or another) can now read and view the entire thing at the pbs site.

Excellent.

I am not a religious person but I have no problem… or little problem… with people practicing their own personal religions in their personal spaces. I do have a huge problem with people attempting to put their religion into public schools, no matter how it’s couched. It just doesn’t belong there. The separation of church and state is there for a reason and, in my view, it’s there for the protection of the church far more than the state. Although both lose, when the two are mixed together.


share this post! | del.icio.us Favicon | | Digg Favicon | | Furl Favicon | | Google Bookmarks Favicon | | NewsVine Favicon | | Spurl Favicon | | StumbleUpon Favicon | | Technorati Favicon |




Random Crabbiness (And Notes): Thank The Goddes For Whoopi

by Nanette

I’m sorry but… what do you mean you don’t know if the earth is flat? 

It’s not that I’m a huge Whoopi Goldberg fan, it’s just that I am so glad that the black woman named Sherry something is not the only black woman on The View. She’s funny and all that, but man… my mom had the show on this morning and there she (Sherry something) is, sitting there saying that not only does she not believe at all in evolution - which is bad enough, but in that she’s not alone - but that she has no idea if the world is flat or not! She’s never thought about it, she says.

I’m all for respecting people’s religious beliefs (or, at least some of them) but c’mon. Anyway, at least Whoopi was there to balance her out with a belief in science (as well as and in conjunction with deities) otherwise it would have been conventional wisdom in no time, among the viewers of that show, that “Black people think the world is flat!”

I guess the idea (if they were even considering it) of having Margaret Cho AND Whoopi on the same show sounded just a bit too combustible, even if far more interesting - thus anti-science, anti-sense, but funny, Sherry something.

[added] Quote for… maybe not the day. Maybe not even a good quote, but there you go - it does have the advantage of being true:

Jena’s problem is not that it has proved itself more racist than the rest of the country, but that it has manifested its racism with insufficient subtlety.

Gary Younge, Guardian UK

I have started an offline journal. In part because when I used to keep one, I liked it - like most people, I write more freely when I know no one (besides me and the NSA) will be reading it until I make it public. This way, I can natter on about this or that thought before pulling them together into something um… finished. And polished. And with all sorts of proper punctuation and grammar.

Okay, sure… let’s not get carried away here.

[added 9/19] about the flat earth and via Oliver Willis, the co-host’s name is Sherri Shepherd. Here is a partial transcript of the exchange and a link to the video. Sigh.

WHOOPI GOLDBERG: Is the world flat?

SHERRI SHEPHERD: Is the world flat? (laughter)

GOLDBERG: Yes.

SHEPHERD: …I Don’t know.

GOLDBERG: What do you think?

SHEPHERD: I… I never thought about it, Whoopi. Is the world flat? I never thought about it.

BARBARA WALTERS: You’ve never thought about whether the world was round or flat?

SHEPHERD: I tell you what I’ve thought about. How I’m going to feed my child–

WALTERS: Well you can do both.

SHEPERD: …how I’m going to take care of my family. The world, is the world flat has never entered into, like that has not been an important thing to me.

ELIZABETH HASSELBECK: You’ll teach your son, Jeffery, right?

SHEPHERD: If my son, Jeffery, asks me ‘is the world flat,’ I guess I would go…

JOY BEHAR: You know, didn’t some person already work this question out? I mean, why are we doing this again? (laughter, applause)


share this post! | del.icio.us Favicon | | Digg Favicon | | Furl Favicon | | Google Bookmarks Favicon | | NewsVine Favicon | | Spurl Favicon | | StumbleUpon Favicon | | Technorati Favicon |




Not Really Related…

by Nanette

Although, looked at in the right light, it could be. 

I’ve been reading these threads off and on, over the past couple of days. Interesting points, much to think about, but… and this is no doubt a consequence of having sometimes decidedly odd thought processes…

... what most comes to mind while reading these is that, very often, people will buy low-fat cookies - and then proceed to eat twice as many of them. 


Posted by Nanette on 09/13 at 08:01 PM
Science-Environment
(0) CommentsPermalinkTell-a-Friend

share this post! | del.icio.us Favicon | | Digg Favicon | | Furl Favicon | | Google Bookmarks Favicon | | NewsVine Favicon | | Spurl Favicon | | StumbleUpon Favicon | | Technorati Favicon |




I Just Saw the Oddest Thing on PBS…

by Nanette

A Black person! Who wasn’t singing, dancing, cooking or Martin Luther King. OR Gwen Ifill.

Two, actually. It didn’t hit me at first, how odd it was. I passed by the living room where my mom was watching the show, glanced at the TV and was well on my way to the kitchen before I stopped and said “Whoa, wait - what was that?” and had to come back and look again.

A science show. With a Black host. On PBS! Will wonders never cease. I remember seeing Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson as an explainer before - I believe he’s an astrophysicist - I can’t remember who he was associated with (no doubt his bio says) but now he is the actual host of NOVA - Science Now, on PBS. This is a good thing. He’s a good talker and makes science seem fun and interesting… which it is, of course, or at least can be.

It’s good to see him (or someone like him) there. I know (and know of) sooooo many Black techies or geeks… online and offline, including in my own family… I didn’t inherit this particular gene, but my father (in Nigeria) is a microbiologist, one brother has a doctorate in engineering, another is a scientist - and that’s just on that side of the family - but it’s a rarity you see that sort of thing reflected in the media. Big surprise, I know.



And there is another show on called History Detectives, with Tukufu Zuberi as one of the researchers. I really like this show, the few times I’ve seen it - possibly because I do love both researching the past and unraveling mysteries.




So, two whole Black folk in non-stereotypical roles on PBS. It’s a start.

Mind you, I live in a red state area of California so in other areas there may already have been loads of people on PBS of various ethnicities hosting various non-stereotypical shows and they’ve just not aired here, but still. Good news.


Posted by Nanette on 07/03 at 08:06 PM
GeneralCivil RightsWhosoutthereJust LifeScience-Environment
(1) CommentsPermalinkTell-a-Friend

share this post! | del.icio.us Favicon | | Digg Favicon | | Furl Favicon | | Google Bookmarks Favicon | | NewsVine Favicon | | Spurl Favicon | | StumbleUpon Favicon | | Technorati Favicon |




It Seems a Shame to Separate Them Now

by Nanette

Did they somehow know they were dying, of whatever cause, and decide to lie down, wrap their arms and legs around each other and die while looking into each other’s eyes? 

embrace in death
AP Photo

These skeletons, recently discovered in Italy - a couple not only hugging but what appears to be completely intertwined - are thought to be 5,000 to 6,000 years old.

According to the BBC, -- "The pair from the Neolithic period were discovered outside Mantua, about 40km (25 miles) south of Verona. The pair, almost certainly a man and a woman, are thought to have died young as their teeth were mostly intact, said chief archaeologist Elena Menotti.

"It's an extraordinary case," said Ms Menotti. "There has not been a double burial found in the Neolithic period, much less two people hugging - and they really are hugging," she told Reuters news agency. --

Arrowheads and a knife were found beside the couple, along with other tools, but there will have to be more study by scientists and archeologists to determine how and when they died and, hopefully, how and when they lived, although that will be a bit more difficult, no doubt.

While it will be science that determines what actually happened, it's hard not to let ones imagination supply the details.

Did they somehow know they were dying, of whatever cause, and decide to lie down, wrap their arms and legs around each other and die while looking into each other's eyes? Or maybe they were just peacefully sleeping, snuggled closely for warmth, and death came so suddenly that they didn't even have a chance to move. It's possible that they were positioned in this manner after death, by some ancient group of mortuary attendants with a romantic bent, but that seems the least likely to me. Not that I know much about ancient burial practices but even Ms. Menotti, who does, says "I've been doing this job for 25 years. I've done digs at Pompeii, all the famous sites, but I've never been so moved because this is the discovery of something special."

Maybe we'll never know... and maybe that's okay.


Posted by Nanette on 02/08 at 08:10 AM
Just LifeScience-Environment
(3) Comments • (0) TrackbacksPermalinkTell-a-Friend

share this post! | del.icio.us Favicon | | Digg Favicon | | Furl Favicon | | Google Bookmarks Favicon | | NewsVine Favicon | | Spurl Favicon | | StumbleUpon Favicon | | Technorati Favicon |



Page 1 of 1 pages